Snapshot

  • Ticker: IREN (Nasdaq, formerly Iris Energy)
  • Bucket: Data-Center Operators (HPC Pivots)
  • Q4 2025 fund position: $328.6 M (8.70 M sh) — 5.96 % of 13F, #7 holding
  • Fiscal year: ends June 30
  • HQ: Sydney (with US operations HQ in Texas)

Business Overview

IREN runs a vertically-integrated digital infrastructure platform — combining renewable-powered Bitcoin self-mining with an AI Cloud business that deploys NVIDIA H100 / H200 / B200 / GB200 GPUs against on-demand and reserved-capacity contracts. The portfolio sits across:

  • Childress, Texas (~750 MW, primarily wind/solar with grid backup) — the legacy mining campus, now also hosting AI cloud capacity.
  • Sweetwater, Texas (Sweetwater 1: 1.4 GW under construction; Sweetwater 2: planned) — purpose-built HPC sites with liquid cooling, redundant fiber, and tier-III uptime.
  • British Columbia, Canada (Mackenzie + Prince George — hydro powered) — the original Iris Energy sites, now smaller share of total capacity.

Unlike Core Scientific (which is mostly a real-estate-and-power host), IREN owns its GPUs on-balance-sheet and earns the cloud-rental margin directly. This captures more of the value chain than pure colocation but exposes IREN to GPU obsolescence and utilization risk.

Financial Trajectory

Metric (USD M)FY24 (Jun-end)FY25 (Jun-end)YoY
Revenue total187.2501.0+168 %
— Bitcoin mining484.6 (96.7 %)
— AI Cloud16.4 (3.3 %)
Adjusted EBITDA269.7+395 %
EBITDA margin54 %
Net income(28.9)+86.9swing to profit

FY25 was IREN’s first profitable year — revenue tripled, EBITDA nearly quintupled, and the company swung from a 87 M net profit. The headline profitability is driven by Bitcoin economics in a post-halving but BTC-price-elevated environment, but the strategic value of FY25 is the inflection of the AI Cloud business from launch to material monetization.

Balance Sheet (6/30/25)

Item$M
Cash564.5
Total assets2,940.3
Total debt (convertibles)962.8
Equity1,817.5

Capital raises during FY25 totaled ~602 M ATM equity + $701 M convertible note issuance. The ATM dilution was substantial but funded the Sweetwater build-out and GPU fleet expansion without taking on bank debt.

Key Operational KPIs (FY25 / 6-30-25)

KPIValue
Hashrate50 EH/s (+400 % YoY)
Operating data-center capacity810 MW (+212 %)
Contracted grid power2,910 MW (+35 %)
GPUs deployed~1,900
GPUs targeted by Dec 202510,900
Annualized AI Cloud revenue (target)$200–250 M

Sweetwater 1 — the Anchor Asset

The Sweetwater Texas campus is the most ambitious HPC build in the bucket and the basis of the fund’s conviction:

  • 1.4 GW design capacity at the first phase site
  • Energization advanced to April 2026 per the most recent update
  • Combined with Childress (100 MW HPC carve-out) and Sweetwater 2, IREN targets ~2 GW of HPC capacity by 2027
  • Liquid-cooled, designed for GB200/GB300 NVL72 racks from inception (no retrofit risk)
  • IREN intends to operate Sweetwater as a mix of (a) AI Cloud capacity it sells directly and (b) colocation hosting for hyperscaler-class tenants

Why It Fits the Thesis

IREN is the bucket’s second-largest position and offers a different expression than Core Scientific: rather than only renting buildings, it owns GPUs and earns the cloud-rental spread. This captures more of the value chain (and more risk). The fund holding both CORZ and IREN suggests deliberate diversification across “real-estate-only” and “real-estate + GPUs” expressions of the same theme.

The 168 % FY25 revenue growth and the inflection to GAAP profitability also distinguish IREN from peers in the bucket — most of whom are still loss-making at the consolidated level.

Position History in the Fund

QuarterPosition
Q1 2025New
Q2 2025Held
Q3 2025Maintained
Q4 20258.70 M sh

Risks

  • Capex intensity. Sweetwater 1 build is multi-billion-dollar over multiple years; financing risk if AI demand softens before full lease-up.
  • GPU obsolescence. Owning the GPU fleet means depreciation accrues to IREN; new generations could compress unit economics on the H100/H200 base before full payback.
  • Bitcoin price exposure. Still 97 % of revenue. If BTC corrects materially during the AI build-out, free cash flow to fund Sweetwater shrinks.
  • Australian dual-listing complexity in valuation across US and Australian shareholder bases.
  • Competition from CoreWeave for the same NVIDIA allocations and customer pipeline.

Sources